If you want: (a) exact Arabic + literal translation, (b) full narrator reliability breakdown, or (c) citations to printed editions/narrator biographies — tell me which and I’ll produce that.
The narrative begins with Al-Miqdam visiting Mu'awiyah in Syria. After learning of the death of Al-Hasan ibn Ali, Al-Miqdam boldly challenges the Caliph, stating he intends to make him "angry" by speaking the truth. He lists three specific prohibitions that he had witnessed being neglected in the Caliph’s court: Wearing Gold: Forbidden for Muslim men. Wearing Silk: Restricted to women, with minor exceptions for men. Leopard/Predator Skins:
This hadith serves as a comprehensive guide to socioeconomic empowerment:
It reinforces the strict prohibition against Muslim men wearing pure silk garments or solid gold jewelry. abu dawood 4131 fixed
In some popular but less critical editions, the text might have been misconstrued to imply a physical flattening. However, verifying the manuscripts reveals that the Hadith is often linked to the concept of the sun's prostration, not the physical topology of the Earth in a scientific sense.
Prominent scholar Sheikh Al-Albani graded the narration as Sahih (Authentic).
In Islamic scholarship, "fixing" a text can mean clarifying its structural reliability ( isnad ). If you want: (a) exact Arabic + literal
The prominent 20th-century scholar, , examined this narration and definitively classified it as sahih (authentic) in his work, Saheeh Abi Dawood (Hadith No. 3479). This classification by al-Albani is widely accepted. Therefore, when someone says the hadith is "fixed," they mean its status has been clearly established as authentic. While the hadith itself is considered sound, scholars have noted that one of its transmitters, Baqiyyah ibn al-Waleed, could be a source of discussion in other narrations, though in this specific case, the grading remains sahih.
: Mu'awiyah admitted that he knew the Prophet (ﷺ) had forbidden these things. Al-Miqdam noted that he saw these items in Mu'awiyah's house, to which Mu'awiyah responded that he knew he could not "be saved" from Al-Miqdam's blunt honesty. Alternative Numbering
This hadith is frequently cited in Shia-Sunni debates to critique the character or actions of Muawiyah. Sunnah.com Summary of Rulings He lists three specific prohibitions that he had
: Al-Miqdam responded with the traditional phrase of mourning ( Inna lillahi wa inna ilayhi raji'un ). However, a man from the Banu Asad present in the court callously remarked that the death of al-Hasan was like "an ember which Allah had extinguished".
The conversation features Al-Miqdam asking Caliph Mu'awiyah to verify hearing the Prophet (ﷺ) forbid men from wearing gold, utilizing silk, and using the skins of predatory animals, to which Mu'awiyah replies "Yes" (Full text available at Sunnah.com ). Isnad Analysis: Resolving the Authenticity
The "fixing" of this hadith is a result of the rigorous work of later scholars, particularly the renowned 20th-century hadith scholar, . By applying advanced principles of hadith criticism, they were able to confirm the hadith's authenticity, mitigating the concerns about Baqiyyah's tadlis .
There are varying scholarly opinions on the authenticity of this specific narration: